.

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Analysis of “Mr Sookhoo” and “A Cat Within”

Money has been, throughout the hi figment of gentlemans gentlemanity, an shutting and an aim for human action. In their pursuit of property, people have followed different paths some honourable, secerned and legal and others devoid of legality, honour and legitimacy. Indeed, in the short degree accumulation Stories from Around the World complied by Hilary Patel, many stories examine the impact of specie and financial considerations on the decisions that many characters make. In Mr Sookhoo, the eponymous character is right a instruction identified to the reader as someone whose sole concern in life is the accumulation of wealth and riches.Mr Sookhoo, sitting on his porch and chewing at a tooth pick discloses an ingenious idea to his helpless wife he informs her that he aims to deploy religion as a tool for making easy money. Mr Sookhoos plan is simple knowing that religious people egest generously around the festive season especially when presented with a theme of innocent carol goofgers raising money for charity, he decides to fabricate an make for the blind, deaf and wearisome and to use local school children to achieve his egoistic money-making aims. Sookhoo shows total disregard to morality putting his personal financial come along at the top of his priorities.Also you can read Analysis July at the MultiplexWhen Mr Sookhoos plan starts containing dividends in the form of unspoilt fetchings on the very first day of his carol singing project, he immediately resolves to work his young assistants (who are not, of course, aware of his malicious intentions) perennial hours giving them little rest. Moreover, when Mr Archibald, the Headmaster of the local school attended by the carol singers, suggests treating the children to ice-cream, Mr Sookhoo chooses to ignore the suggestion buying the children only a change drink that clearly costs less than the ice-cream.It is clear here that Sookhoo is listless to anything however his obsession with making easy money. In Christianity, Sookhoo is guilty of the sin of voracity or greed which is one of the seven deadly sins that request total loss of faith. In the story, Mr Sookhoo is not a Christian but pretends to be one convincing Mr Archibald that he had seen the light in order to gain his approval for sending children with him on the carol singing mission.Mr Sookhoos avarice leads to his eventual d have gotfall when he is found out and captured at the end of the story. Sookhoos avarice leads to a snowballing of unfortunate occurrences that upset the money-making plan that seemed to be vent too well. All at once many characters appear in the story pushing, as it were, one more nail into Sookhoos coffin. First, Mr Ali, who had previously pay Sookhoo to deliver some gravel for him, appears and exposes Sookhoos failure to keep his end of the bargain.In addition, Mr Archibald, who started harbouring doubts about Mr Sookhoo when the latters account of the carol singing successe s did not correspond to what Mr Archibald was told by a young pupil called Horace, receives a visitor by the hollo of Mr Harris (who is a real philanthropist working in the charity field) who confirms to him that the deaf, dumb and blind institute does not exist. These revelations and findings raise tension in the story and drive the plotline towards its climax when Mr Sookhoos love of money brings about his downfall and arrest. rede also Analysis of Characters in Flannery OConnors The Life You publish May Be Your OwnAt the end of the story, poetic judge is upheld as the aggressor and wrong doer is punished while the good are rewarded. Mr Sookhoo ends on the note that a blind love of money can only lead to negative consequences. The price that Sookhoo pays for being a slave to money and materialistic gain is no less than his freedom. Mr Sookhoos metaphoric slavery (signaled by his servitude to anything that can lead to making money) at the send-off of the story becomes the cause of his physical incarceration, which is a form a slavery, at the end.Although in the case of Mr Sookhoo, poetic justice is upheld as good is rewarded and unrighteous is punished, the so-called cliff-hanger ending of A Cat at bottom where the reader is left over(p) to decide whether justice will be at all served, contrasts to the marrow of Mr Sookhoo. In A Cat Within, where the symbol of the cat acts as a reminder of a dark secret that comes back to haunt the un-named Shopman in the story, the love of money seems to have caused a series of crimes much weightier than those committed by Mr Sookhoo, but there is no indication that these crimes will be punished.In fact, one possible interpretation for the blurred ending of the story is that the Exorcists own love of money will prompt him to eternally pressure the Shopman in order to keep his crimes safely tucked away and incomprehensible like the cats head stuck in the metal urn. A Cat Within ends with the Exorcist withdrawing i nto his room but reminding the Shopman that he will request his pay later. This reminder could be read as a covert threat and a prelude to a life-long blackmail project the Exorcist hopes to come in on. In A Cat Within, both the Shopman and the Exorcist display their essential attachment to money.On the one hand, the Shopman keeps his tenants in dire living conditions and sacrifices his own comfort by sleeping in the doorway to stop intruders from plan of attack into his house. On the other hand, the Exorcist makes his living by giving the paradoxical impression that he is curing people from obsessions by demons and other fey evil beings. When the Exorcist is called upon to help with the assumed evil spirit wreaking massacre in the shop store, his world that places money at the top of the consideration list and the world of the Shopman, where money occupies the same place, meet.Read also case 302 July in MultiplexThe Exorcist being adept at instruction people like a book, man ages to speculate accurately about the Shopman and the way he came to accumulate his wealth. It transpires that the Shopman killed a man and his widow before taking their land and money. However, unlike Mr Sookhoo, the Shopman remains free at the end with the cat, a symbol of his dark secret, roaming in the streets with a jug on its head. The symbolism of the cat slipping out of the store but with its head lock in caught inside the jug suggests that the Shopmans secret is only half revealed.

No comments:

Post a Comment