Gay Marriages Make Them Legal: Rebuttal Essay

Thomas Stoddards Gay Marriages Make Them Legal, has some valid points, but I am not convinced nor persuaded to agree that gay trip outual unions should be countenanced. Stoddard begins with the melancholic level of a gay couple. Karen Thompson and Sharon Kowalski who exchanged vows that were not recognized by the goernwork forcet, and were alive(p)liness with each other in a move relationship until Kowalski was laid low(p) by a drunk driver, which left her paralyzed and unable to advance more(prenominal) than a few words at a condemnation (para 2). Thompson desire legal guardianship over her pardner, which was denied, when Kowalskis parents impertinent the c any for and were granted sole guardianship. Once Kowalskis parents received guardianship over her they moved her to a nursing home 300 miles away from her partner and forbade every last(predicate) visits among the two (para 3).The theme of Thomas and Kowalski is a sad story that no couple, gay or straight, should keep to endure however, I dont believe legalizing gay weddings would oblige minded(p) their story a different outcome. Case in point Terri Schiavo who was diagnosed by doctors as being in a persistent vegetative state stayed resilient for several years via support-support despite the request of her husband to guide the support and allow Terri to expire arguing that his wife would not penury to be kept alive by artificial means. Michael Schiavo petiti championd the court to have his wifes feeding tube removed he was opposed by Terris parents Robert and Mary Schindler who surroundd she was conscious.The court ruled in Michaels favor and had the feeding tubes removed only to have it reinstated after the Schindlers filed an appeal. The appeal process went on from 2001 to 2005. After all attempts of appeals the court corpse upheld the original decision to remove the feeding tubes 13 days later Terri died. Despite being the husband of Terri Schiavo Michael had to go through 14 appeals, 5 lawsuits, and numerous motions, going all the way up to the Supreme appeal to have his wishes for his wife set frontward. Being the legal husband of Teri do no difference, before he could allow his wishes to be set forth he had to do his due diligence in court.If Thompson would have sought all legal options and exhausted all of her appeals, it is possible that her case could have had a different outcome. Having their coupling legalized whitethorn not have given her the outcome she petitioned the court for, thus weakening the reasons behind legalizing gay trade union. The join States of America is based on Christian principles and in this clownish marriage has been outlined as a religious and legal commitment between a man and a woman and we should uphold those beliefs. Homosexual marriage should not be encouraged, it confuses children closely grammatical gender roles and weakens the definition and respect for the debut of marriage.If gay marriage were legal we w ould have to ask ourselves if it is in the beaver interest for the entire county. Stoddards has a point when he argues The decision whether or not to marry belongs properly to individuals not the government (para 6). Most would argue that the government does have the right to say what is legal and what is not. However, not all that is legal is moral, especially if it promotes moral deterioration of American society. For instance redden though abortion is legal does it mean its moral? Our country should focus on things that are moral whether than the things we as a muckle feel are fair. If we legalize gay marriage, is that not a entrance for other immoral behavior? If that is the case, how then, do we expect to bring up future generation with morals and family determine?Children learn about expectations of gender roles from their parents first, then society. It is difficult for parents to teach the importance and traditions of the family when the confusion of homosexual marriage is thrust upon them. Legalizing gay marriages will not set a pricy example for future generations. It will confuse our offspring and encourage diseased behavior. For instance, an issue analysis done by Family Research Council advocating Faith, Family, and Freedom showed that the life expectancy at age twenty for gay and bisexual men is eight to twenty years fewer than for all men (FRC). In addition the Suicide Prevention Resource Center estimates that between thirty and forty percent of gay, and lesbian youth depending on age and sex groups, have attempted suicide and are four times more likely to attempt suicide than other young people (SPRC).With such(prenominal) statistics we should not allow our children to call on up believing that living a homosexual lifestyle is a healthy choice. If we do, it is possible these statistics will ride causing a larger percentage of our youth to die young. fit in to Stoddard A married person can share in a spouses estate when there is no wi ll. She is typically authorise to the group insurance and pension programs offered by the spouses employer, and she enjoys impose advantages (para 5). Although these advantages are important, they are not as important as keeping our youth alive with good family morals and value.Lisa Schiffren in Gay Marriage, an Oxymoron had a valid point when she argued Same sex marriage is inherently inharmonious with our cultures understanding of the institution. Marriage is essentially a womb-to-tomb compact between a man and a woman committed to sexual exclusivity and the creation and nature of offspring. For most Americans, the marital union as distinguished from other sexual relationships and legal and economic partnership is imbued with an formula of holiness (Schiffren 754). Allowing immoral acts that go against our countrys beliefs and value does not instill morals in our youth.Instead it will select to our youth growing up with the mindset that anything goes and that there are n o standards to live by if they believe in it it is justified. In order to preserve the values of the United Sates we, as a nation should guide our youth to draw our Constitution which is built on Christian faith. Although Stoddard and other gay rights advocates may argue that the government has no say in who shall marry and that alike sex marriage will represent equality in all they are not looking at foundation of this country. Society cares about stability in heterosexual unions because it is critical for raising healthy children and transfer the values that are the basis of our culture (Schiffren 724).Stoddards argument to legalize gay marriages based on allowing homosexuals to have the right to enjoy the benefits and laws of marriage is not strong enough to have the countrys values and beliefs compromised. We have to set the standard for our future not doing so could lead to a nation where laws and values are not valued. Our youth would grow up confused on gender roles, not valuing the countrys Christian principles, and this countrys definition of marriage being defined as a religious and legal commitment between a man and a woman. Although we all have the right to commit ourselves to whomever we choose, one should not expect our countrys values and laws to change because he/she chooses to live outside of them.Works CitedLane, Diane. The Whole Terri Schiavo Story. WND. N.p., 24 Mar. 2005. Web. 31 Jan. 2013.The disconfirming Health Effects of Homosexuality. The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Feb. 2013.Suicidal conduct among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth. SPRC. American Association of Suicidology (AAS), 2012. Web. 04 Feb. 2013.Barnet, Sylvan, Hugo Adam. Bedau, and Thomas Stoddard. Gay Marriage Make Them Legal. new Issues and Enduring Questions A Guide to Critical persuasion and Argument, with Readings. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 1999. N. pag. bulls eyeSchiffren, Lisa. Marriage What Is Its Future. Current Issues and Enduring Questions A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument, with Readings. By Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Adam. Bedau. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 2002. 723-24. Print