“the Quest For Wisdom.” Compare Two Philosophy Books

The Quest for WisdomIn his novel Brave New World Aldous Huxley warns of the halt of over-reliance on material acquaintance . Plato s account of the last geezerhood of Socrates as well as presents us with an argument against materialism , but kind of as dialectic . Huxley is trying to succeed to grips with a mod valet in which material determine reign unequivocal . In his novel there is a suggestion that a chemical drug might be holding the base to the nihilism that material erudition engenders . The inhabitants of his twenty-sixth century dystopia begin the soma drug whenever gladness wanes . though this is pictured in a negative light , ulterior on in life Huxley experimented with reality-bending drugs like mescalin , hence channelize a intended step towards his `brave new beingness . The account of his experie nces (The Doors of erudition ) proved seminal in rescue about the lilting sixties . Socrates was also responding to materialists , of a contrary sort , and from a different age . The Sophists maintained that familiarity should sole(prenominal) be for practical use . They not only preached utilitarianism but also made their own instruction helpful by charging outrageous fees Socrates charged that the Sophists were teaching the art of lie . They c bed nothing for cognizance , and promised their students privilege and position if they could employ their sophistication to merely deliver the goods the argument . The Socratic Method was thus to dissemble the sophistic argument . Both Huxley and Socrates , therefore , designate material knowledge . only when Huxley wants to portray edict in the grips of materialism , darn the aim of Socrates is to dissemble the material argumentThe advise of Huxley is that material acquaintance is liable to lose its way . Losing push-do wn stack of its goal it becomes confine in ! the parameters of the technology that it engenders . Science defines itself as a request for wisdom , and finds its beginnings in the spirit of remainder . Such was the substance of science in the periods of the Renaissance and the understanding . But Huxley shows the gross(a) eventuality of this historical process , where physically bring forth happiness has replaced any solemn purposefulness , even though the rules of science have prevailed completely in this world . In this proximo time (the 26th century , human beings atomic number 18 germinated and bred unnaturally in e normous factories . There is a five-fold hierarchal remains , and the breeding is planned so that there are ample members in each caste , designed so that society functions smoothly . If there is any wisdom leftover in this society it is in a tiny elite group at the top of this system comprising the planners and overseers . For everyone else thoughtlessness in the norm , and indeed the slightest att ack of contemplation is cured promptly by the taking of the soma drug . The savages live beyond the perimeters of refinement in primitive conditions . John the Savage , an intruder into the cultured world , notices the inhumanity of it all , confronts the World command to knowledge . But that s the price we have to pay for stability explains Controller calmly (Huxley 1932 ,. 264 . The logic in science has...If you want to mystify a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper